https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61454 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the additions made by the Assessing Officer in the appeals for the assessment years 1986-87 and 1987-88. The Assessing Officer's additions for excessive husk consumption and valuation discrepancies were deemed unjustified, with the Tribunal citing lack of evidence and inconsistencies in valuation methods. The Revenue's appeals were dismissed, and the cross-objections by the assessee were allowed, resulting in the partial deletion of the additions sustained by the CIT(A). en-us Tue, 04 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61454 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the additions made by the Assessing Officer in the appeals for the assessment years 1986-87 and 1987-88. The Assessing Officer's additions for excessive husk consumption and valuation discrepancies were deemed unjustified, with the Tribunal citing lack of evidence and inconsistencies in valuation methods. The Revenue's appeals were dismissed, and the cross-objections by the assessee were allowed, resulting in the partial deletion of the additions sustained by the CIT(A). Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 04 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61454