<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (6) TMI 36 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61453</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting the additions of Rs. 1,47,203 for commission paid to agents, Rs. 1,72,218 for trading addition due to a drop in G.P. rate, Rs. 39,500 for squared-up cash credits, and Rs. 47,100 in the names of minor children on account of accretion in cash credits. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the cross-objection by the assessee became infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:37:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (6) TMI 36 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61453</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting the additions of Rs. 1,47,203 for commission paid to agents, Rs. 1,72,218 for trading addition due to a drop in G.P. rate, Rs. 39,500 for squared-up cash credits, and Rs. 47,100 in the names of minor children on account of accretion in cash credits. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the cross-objection by the assessee became infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>