<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (2) TMI 105 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61433</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under section 140A for delayed tax payment by a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) for the assessment year 1983-84. The appellant&#039;s challenge to the penalty and the effective date for penalty calculation was dismissed. The tribunal affirmed the assessing officer&#039;s decision, ruling that the penalty was correctly imposed based on the original return filing date, and financial constraints were not considered as valid reasons for the delay. The appeal was dismissed, and the penalty was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:04:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (2) TMI 105 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61433</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under section 140A for delayed tax payment by a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) for the assessment year 1983-84. The appellant&#039;s challenge to the penalty and the effective date for penalty calculation was dismissed. The tribunal affirmed the assessing officer&#039;s decision, ruling that the penalty was correctly imposed based on the original return filing date, and financial constraints were not considered as valid reasons for the delay. The appeal was dismissed, and the penalty was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>