<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (5) TMI 97 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61414</link>
    <description>Additions based on assumed yield or conjecture cannot stand without material evidence of suppression, so the rice-bran addition was deleted. For rice husk, the record showed dual use in sale and in the assessee&#039;s dryer plant, so only a limited estimated addition of Rs. 15,000 was justified rather than full deletion. A payment described as additional sales-tax was treated as compensatory rather than punitive, making it an allowable business outgoing and not a disallowable penalty. The result was partial relief to the Revenue only on the husk issue, with relief to the assessee on the other two issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:35:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (5) TMI 97 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61414</link>
      <description>Additions based on assumed yield or conjecture cannot stand without material evidence of suppression, so the rice-bran addition was deleted. For rice husk, the record showed dual use in sale and in the assessee&#039;s dryer plant, so only a limited estimated addition of Rs. 15,000 was justified rather than full deletion. A payment described as additional sales-tax was treated as compensatory rather than punitive, making it an allowable business outgoing and not a disallowable penalty. The result was partial relief to the Revenue only on the husk issue, with relief to the assessee on the other two issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>