<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (12) TMI 67 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61393</link>
    <description>Residential HUF property occupied by the deceased was fully exempt from estate duty where its value fell within the statutory ceiling. Because the exemption covered the entire house, no part of its value could be aggregated for rate purposes. Separately, the lineal descendant&#039;s share in ancestral property remained subject to aggregation for rate purposes under the applicable provision, following a binding High Court ruling upholding that provision&#039;s validity. Dismissal of a special leave petition without reasons did not affirm or alter the High Court&#039;s reasoning. The residential-house exemption was sustained, while aggregation of the lineal descendant&#039;s share was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:04:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (12) TMI 67 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61393</link>
      <description>Residential HUF property occupied by the deceased was fully exempt from estate duty where its value fell within the statutory ceiling. Because the exemption covered the entire house, no part of its value could be aggregated for rate purposes. Separately, the lineal descendant&#039;s share in ancestral property remained subject to aggregation for rate purposes under the applicable provision, following a binding High Court ruling upholding that provision&#039;s validity. Dismissal of a special leave petition without reasons did not affirm or alter the High Court&#039;s reasoning. The residential-house exemption was sustained, while aggregation of the lineal descendant&#039;s share was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>