<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (12) TMI 64 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61383</link>
    <description>The judgment addressed departmental appeals on various expense disputes. The court upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on lodging charges, dealer expenses, motor repairs, advertisement costs, staff quarters depreciation, generator shift allowance, Rim Plant depreciation, and weighted deduction, dismissing one appeal and partly allowing another. The rulings were based on the CIT(A)&#039;s analysis and application of relevant provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:30:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (12) TMI 64 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61383</link>
      <description>The judgment addressed departmental appeals on various expense disputes. The court upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on lodging charges, dealer expenses, motor repairs, advertisement costs, staff quarters depreciation, generator shift allowance, Rim Plant depreciation, and weighted deduction, dismissing one appeal and partly allowing another. The rulings were based on the CIT(A)&#039;s analysis and application of relevant provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>