<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (8) TMI 117 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61373</link>
    <description>In wealth-tax treatment of HUF assets, the legal fiction under section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 was applied only for ascertaining shares on a notional partition, and not to exclude the deceased coparcener&#039;s share from HUF property where no partition or claim for separation was shown; the 1/3rd inclusion was therefore maintained. A residential-house exemption claim under section 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act was not entertained because it had not been raised before the Wealth-tax Officer and lacked a factual foundation. The residential house valuation at Rs. 3 lakhs was sustained for want of fresh material, while agricultural land value was reduced modestly to Rs. 3,250 per acre.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:07:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (8) TMI 117 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61373</link>
      <description>In wealth-tax treatment of HUF assets, the legal fiction under section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 was applied only for ascertaining shares on a notional partition, and not to exclude the deceased coparcener&#039;s share from HUF property where no partition or claim for separation was shown; the 1/3rd inclusion was therefore maintained. A residential-house exemption claim under section 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act was not entertained because it had not been raised before the Wealth-tax Officer and lacked a factual foundation. The residential house valuation at Rs. 3 lakhs was sustained for want of fresh material, while agricultural land value was reduced modestly to Rs. 3,250 per acre.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>