<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (5) TMI 61 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61361</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the AAC&#039;s decision to exclude the salary income of a partner&#039;s husband from the assessee-firm&#039;s assessment for the years 1980-81 to 1982-83. The Tribunal emphasized the husband&#039;s technical expertise in pesticides and chemicals, supported by the Webster Dictionary&#039;s definition of &quot;profession.&quot; Citing section 64(1)(ii) exceptions for spouses with technical professional knowledge, the Tribunal found no reason to interfere, distinguishing previous case laws where facts did not align. The husband&#039;s extensive experience led to the dismissal of Revenue&#039;s appeals, confirming the exclusion of his salary from clubbing provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:13:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (5) TMI 61 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61361</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the AAC&#039;s decision to exclude the salary income of a partner&#039;s husband from the assessee-firm&#039;s assessment for the years 1980-81 to 1982-83. The Tribunal emphasized the husband&#039;s technical expertise in pesticides and chemicals, supported by the Webster Dictionary&#039;s definition of &quot;profession.&quot; Citing section 64(1)(ii) exceptions for spouses with technical professional knowledge, the Tribunal found no reason to interfere, distinguishing previous case laws where facts did not align. The husband&#039;s extensive experience led to the dismissal of Revenue&#039;s appeals, confirming the exclusion of his salary from clubbing provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>