<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (5) TMI 92 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61326</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s cross objection, granting weighted deductions under s. 35B for specific expenses and confirming entitlement to s. 80J relief for the Electroplating unit for the relevant assessment year. The Tribunal directed the ITO to grant weighted deduction at specified percentages for ECGC, salary, and office expenses, and allowed the claim for interest on packing credit under s. 35B.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:11:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (5) TMI 92 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61326</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s cross objection, granting weighted deductions under s. 35B for specific expenses and confirming entitlement to s. 80J relief for the Electroplating unit for the relevant assessment year. The Tribunal directed the ITO to grant weighted deduction at specified percentages for ECGC, salary, and office expenses, and allowed the claim for interest on packing credit under s. 35B.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>