<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (6) TMI 59 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61322</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the addition of Rs. 3,000 in the savings account, finding the disallowance unjustified due to accurate sawing charges in the books. However, the Tribunal upheld the payment of a secret commission of Rs. 8,222, deeming it essential for business operations and permissible to enhance sales. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, while the assessee&#039;s appeal was partially allowed for the assessment year 1980-81.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:05:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (6) TMI 59 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61322</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the addition of Rs. 3,000 in the savings account, finding the disallowance unjustified due to accurate sawing charges in the books. However, the Tribunal upheld the payment of a secret commission of Rs. 8,222, deeming it essential for business operations and permissible to enhance sales. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, while the assessee&#039;s appeal was partially allowed for the assessment year 1980-81.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>