<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (1) TMI 118 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61302</link>
    <description>The Tribunal declined the Commissioner&#039;s request for reference to the High Court regarding the cancellation of a reassessment order by the Tribunal. The Tribunal emphasized that the issue was primarily factual and did not raise any legal questions warranting a reference. Despite the departmental representative&#039;s insistence citing case laws, the Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, highlighting that the valuation matter had already been addressed in the original assessment and could not be revisited based solely on a subsequent valuation report. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on established facts and legal principles, resulting in the dismissal of the reference application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:29:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (1) TMI 118 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61302</link>
      <description>The Tribunal declined the Commissioner&#039;s request for reference to the High Court regarding the cancellation of a reassessment order by the Tribunal. The Tribunal emphasized that the issue was primarily factual and did not raise any legal questions warranting a reference. Despite the departmental representative&#039;s insistence citing case laws, the Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, highlighting that the valuation matter had already been addressed in the original assessment and could not be revisited based solely on a subsequent valuation report. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on established facts and legal principles, resulting in the dismissal of the reference application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>