<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (2) TMI 93 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61289</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the cancellation of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) by the AAC, emphasizing the importance of the timing of penalty imposition in relation to the final determination of income and the legal provisions applicable at the time of filing the return. The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed based on the findings related to the unauthorized penalty imposition and the timing of the penalty order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:58:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (2) TMI 93 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61289</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the cancellation of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) by the AAC, emphasizing the importance of the timing of penalty imposition in relation to the final determination of income and the legal provisions applicable at the time of filing the return. The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed based on the findings related to the unauthorized penalty imposition and the timing of the penalty order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>