<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (4) TMI 88 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61286</link>
    <description>Interest disallowance could not be sustained where the revenue failed to establish a nexus between the assessee&#039;s interest-bearing borrowings and the interest-free advance to a related concern. The burden to prove that the borrowed funds were used for the impugned advance rested on the revenue, and that burden was not discharged. In the absence of such correlation, the addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:53:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (4) TMI 88 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61286</link>
      <description>Interest disallowance could not be sustained where the revenue failed to establish a nexus between the assessee&#039;s interest-bearing borrowings and the interest-free advance to a related concern. The burden to prove that the borrowed funds were used for the impugned advance rested on the revenue, and that burden was not discharged. In the absence of such correlation, the addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>