<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (4) TMI 87 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61281</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals and dismissed those of the revenue, deleting the imposed penalties. The tribunal found that the assessee&#039;s actions were not indicative of intentional concealment but rather a genuine mistake, as evidenced by the voluntary disclosure of income from the same assets for income tax purposes. The tribunal concluded that there was no justification for sustaining the penalties, considering the assessee&#039;s voluntary correction of omissions and good faith demonstrated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:46:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (4) TMI 87 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61281</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals and dismissed those of the revenue, deleting the imposed penalties. The tribunal found that the assessee&#039;s actions were not indicative of intentional concealment but rather a genuine mistake, as evidenced by the voluntary disclosure of income from the same assets for income tax purposes. The tribunal concluded that there was no justification for sustaining the penalties, considering the assessee&#039;s voluntary correction of omissions and good faith demonstrated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>