<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (4) TMI 86 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61280</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the CIT (Appeals)&#039; decision to annul the reassessment under section 143(3) read with section 147(b) of the IT Act. The Tribunal found that the revenue&#039;s attempt to include the minor son&#039;s income for a different period was a mere change of opinion by the ITO and did not meet the conditions under section 147(b). The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the lack of sufficient reasons for the reassessment and confirming the annulment by the CIT (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:44:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (4) TMI 86 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61280</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the CIT (Appeals)&#039; decision to annul the reassessment under section 143(3) read with section 147(b) of the IT Act. The Tribunal found that the revenue&#039;s attempt to include the minor son&#039;s income for a different period was a mere change of opinion by the ITO and did not meet the conditions under section 147(b). The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the lack of sufficient reasons for the reassessment and confirming the annulment by the CIT (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>