<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (12) TMI 102 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61277</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for exemption under s. 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth Tax Act for both properties in Madhopuri, considering the unity of structure and common features shared by the properties, despite separate acquisitions and municipal numbers. The decision overturned the lower authorities&#039; denial of exemption for one of the properties, highlighting the significance of physical connections and shared characteristics in treating multiple properties as a single entity for tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:38:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (12) TMI 102 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61277</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for exemption under s. 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth Tax Act for both properties in Madhopuri, considering the unity of structure and common features shared by the properties, despite separate acquisitions and municipal numbers. The decision overturned the lower authorities&#039; denial of exemption for one of the properties, highlighting the significance of physical connections and shared characteristics in treating multiple properties as a single entity for tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>