<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (8) TMI 102 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61269</link>
    <description>Payment made to prevent cancellation or suspension of an excise licence was treated as a business expense because it was incurred to preserve the assessee&#039;s profit-earning apparatus and continue trade. The analysis distinguished a punitive payment for breach of law from a payment made to keep the business alive; only the latter was regarded as an ordinary incident of business. On that basis, the expenditure was held to satisfy the test of being wholly and exclusively laid out for business purposes and was deductible in computing total income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:27:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (8) TMI 102 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61269</link>
      <description>Payment made to prevent cancellation or suspension of an excise licence was treated as a business expense because it was incurred to preserve the assessee&#039;s profit-earning apparatus and continue trade. The analysis distinguished a punitive payment for breach of law from a payment made to keep the business alive; only the latter was regarded as an ordinary incident of business. On that basis, the expenditure was held to satisfy the test of being wholly and exclusively laid out for business purposes and was deductible in computing total income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>