<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (3) TMI 103 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61263</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in a dispute over the deletion of unaccounted stock value from a bank pledge. The Tribunal found that the assessee adequately proved that the stocks belonged to sister concerns, not the assessee, based on various evidence, including the pledge certificate statement. Consequently, the disputed amount was deleted, and the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:18:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (3) TMI 103 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61263</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in a dispute over the deletion of unaccounted stock value from a bank pledge. The Tribunal found that the assessee adequately proved that the stocks belonged to sister concerns, not the assessee, based on various evidence, including the pledge certificate statement. Consequently, the disputed amount was deleted, and the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>