<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (9) TMI 115 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61242</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the penalty for late filing of the return under section 271(1)(a) of the IT Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1976-77. The Tribunal found that the serious illnesses suffered by the partners, including the partner in charge of accounts, constituted a valid and sufficient cause for the delay. Emphasizing the need for consistency in revenue decisions, the Tribunal noted that a similar cause for delay in a subsequent assessment year had been accepted, leading to the dropping of penalty proceedings. Consequently, the penalty imposed for the assessment year 1976-77 was deemed unjustified and canceled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 14:24:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (9) TMI 115 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61242</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the penalty for late filing of the return under section 271(1)(a) of the IT Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1976-77. The Tribunal found that the serious illnesses suffered by the partners, including the partner in charge of accounts, constituted a valid and sufficient cause for the delay. Emphasizing the need for consistency in revenue decisions, the Tribunal noted that a similar cause for delay in a subsequent assessment year had been accepted, leading to the dropping of penalty proceedings. Consequently, the penalty imposed for the assessment year 1976-77 was deemed unjustified and canceled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>