<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (10) TMI 75 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61239</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the exemption for the assessee&#039;s interest in the poultry farming firm as an industrial undertaking under section 5(1)(xxxii) of the Wealth Tax Act. However, the claim for exemption under section 5(1)(x) for tools and instruments used in the poultry business was rejected, as the assessee&#039;s partnership in the firm did not qualify as independently carrying on a profession or vocation. Both the revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s cross-objections were dismissed by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 14:14:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (10) TMI 75 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61239</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the exemption for the assessee&#039;s interest in the poultry farming firm as an industrial undertaking under section 5(1)(xxxii) of the Wealth Tax Act. However, the claim for exemption under section 5(1)(x) for tools and instruments used in the poultry business was rejected, as the assessee&#039;s partnership in the firm did not qualify as independently carrying on a profession or vocation. Both the revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s cross-objections were dismissed by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>