<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (1) TMI 131 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61228</link>
    <description>Rented immovable properties for wealth-tax purposes may be valued by capitalising the net maintainable rent where that method reflects the facts of the case. Here, the revenue valuation and the figure sustained in appeal were found excessive, and an appropriate capitalisation multiple of 10 was applied to the rent yielding from the properties. On that basis, the valuation was worked out at Rs. 3,21,200, resulting in a lower wealth-tax value and relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:54:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (1) TMI 131 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61228</link>
      <description>Rented immovable properties for wealth-tax purposes may be valued by capitalising the net maintainable rent where that method reflects the facts of the case. Here, the revenue valuation and the figure sustained in appeal were found excessive, and an appropriate capitalisation multiple of 10 was applied to the rent yielding from the properties. On that basis, the valuation was worked out at Rs. 3,21,200, resulting in a lower wealth-tax value and relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>