<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (3) TMI 132 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61181</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the reference applications, highlighting the factual nature of the issues and the absence of referable questions of law. It clarified the determination of the cost of acquisition, the application of Section 54 for exemptions, and the treatment of capital gains for the commercial portion of the property, providing a thorough understanding of the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:18:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (3) TMI 132 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61181</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the reference applications, highlighting the factual nature of the issues and the absence of referable questions of law. It clarified the determination of the cost of acquisition, the application of Section 54 for exemptions, and the treatment of capital gains for the commercial portion of the property, providing a thorough understanding of the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>