<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (1) TMI 89 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61153</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Income Tax Officer&#039;s failure to provide reasons for reopening assessments rendered the reassessments invalid. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the additions made by the Officer based on conjectures and surmises lacked evidentiary support. Consequently, the reassessments were deemed unlawful, and all additions were canceled, leading to the appeals being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:22:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (1) TMI 89 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61153</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Income Tax Officer&#039;s failure to provide reasons for reopening assessments rendered the reassessments invalid. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the additions made by the Officer based on conjectures and surmises lacked evidentiary support. Consequently, the reassessments were deemed unlawful, and all additions were canceled, leading to the appeals being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>