<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (9) TMI 166 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61148</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, holding that the firm&#039;s registration was valid, and the Commissioner erred in canceling the ITO&#039;s order under section 263 of the IT Act, 1961. The ITAT emphasized the genuineness of the partnership and compliance with legal requirements for registration, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and reinstating the status quo ante. The decision was based on the firm&#039;s adherence to the law and proper handling of changes in the partnership structure, as evidenced by the partnership deed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:17:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (9) TMI 166 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61148</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, holding that the firm&#039;s registration was valid, and the Commissioner erred in canceling the ITO&#039;s order under section 263 of the IT Act, 1961. The ITAT emphasized the genuineness of the partnership and compliance with legal requirements for registration, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and reinstating the status quo ante. The decision was based on the firm&#039;s adherence to the law and proper handling of changes in the partnership structure, as evidenced by the partnership deed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>