<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (12) TMI 91 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61131</link>
    <description>The court canceled the penalties imposed under section 18(1)(a) of the Wealth Tax Act for four assessment years, citing unjustified, illegal, and arbitrary imposition. It emphasized the importance of providing a reasonable opportunity for compliance with notices under section 18(2) of the Act and being heard before penalties are imposed. The court also raised doubts about the validity of penalty proceedings due to disputes regarding the service of a letter and highlighted the necessity of clear and specific charges in penalty notices. Ultimately, the penalties were revoked for all four years, with the court ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:36:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (12) TMI 91 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61131</link>
      <description>The court canceled the penalties imposed under section 18(1)(a) of the Wealth Tax Act for four assessment years, citing unjustified, illegal, and arbitrary imposition. It emphasized the importance of providing a reasonable opportunity for compliance with notices under section 18(2) of the Act and being heard before penalties are imposed. The court also raised doubts about the validity of penalty proceedings due to disputes regarding the service of a letter and highlighted the necessity of clear and specific charges in penalty notices. Ultimately, the penalties were revoked for all four years, with the court ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>