<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (5) TMI 35 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61127</link>
    <description>For estate duty aggregation in a Mitakshara HUF, the deceased&#039;s interest must be determined on the basis of a notional partition. Applying that principle, the son&#039;s wife was a sharer in the smaller HUF headed by the deceased&#039;s son and could not be excluded when determining the lineal descendants&#039; shares. The aggregation therefore could not be confined to the son and grandsons alone, and the taxable estate had to be recomputed on that basis. The assessee&#039;s computation was accepted for recomputation, and the assessment was set aside to the extent necessary to reflect the correct notional partition shares.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (5) TMI 35 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61127</link>
      <description>For estate duty aggregation in a Mitakshara HUF, the deceased&#039;s interest must be determined on the basis of a notional partition. Applying that principle, the son&#039;s wife was a sharer in the smaller HUF headed by the deceased&#039;s son and could not be excluded when determining the lineal descendants&#039; shares. The aggregation therefore could not be confined to the son and grandsons alone, and the taxable estate had to be recomputed on that basis. The assessee&#039;s computation was accepted for recomputation, and the assessment was set aside to the extent necessary to reflect the correct notional partition shares.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>