<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (10) TMI 100 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61125</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Appellate Authority Commissioner (AAC) in favor of the assessee, allowing the provision in the commission account. The Tribunal found the provision justified based on actual sales and past practices, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The cross objection by the assessee seeking no relief was deemed infructuous and dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:25:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (10) TMI 100 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61125</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Appellate Authority Commissioner (AAC) in favor of the assessee, allowing the provision in the commission account. The Tribunal found the provision justified based on actual sales and past practices, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The cross objection by the assessee seeking no relief was deemed infructuous and dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>