<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (9) TMI 114 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61124</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty of Rs. 37,000 imposed by the ITO under Section 273(a) of the IT Act, 1961. The tribunal found that the assessee had provided justifications for its estimated income and that there was no evidence to prove that the estimate was knowingly untrue. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:21:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (9) TMI 114 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61124</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty of Rs. 37,000 imposed by the ITO under Section 273(a) of the IT Act, 1961. The tribunal found that the assessee had provided justifications for its estimated income and that there was no evidence to prove that the estimate was knowingly untrue. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>