<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (6) TMI 59 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61107</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the respondent&#039;s preliminary objections and upheld the maintainability of the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It remanded the case to the AAC for further examination, focusing on clarifying the involvement of Lekh Ram in signing partnership documents and addressing concerns about the genuineness of the partnership. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of substance over procedural technicalities in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:23:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (6) TMI 59 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61107</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the respondent&#039;s preliminary objections and upheld the maintainability of the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It remanded the case to the AAC for further examination, focusing on clarifying the involvement of Lekh Ram in signing partnership documents and addressing concerns about the genuineness of the partnership. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of substance over procedural technicalities in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>