<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (7) TMI 109 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61099</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant firm was entitled to registration under Section 185(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the appellant firm was a genuine partnership and not a benami concern of another firm. The Tribunal directed the Income Tax Officer to grant registration to the firm, as the revenue failed to provide substantial evidence supporting the benami claim. The appeal was allowed, and the orders of the Income Tax Officer and the Appellate Authority Commissioner were overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:07:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (7) TMI 109 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61099</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant firm was entitled to registration under Section 185(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the appellant firm was a genuine partnership and not a benami concern of another firm. The Tribunal directed the Income Tax Officer to grant registration to the firm, as the revenue failed to provide substantial evidence supporting the benami claim. The appeal was allowed, and the orders of the Income Tax Officer and the Appellate Authority Commissioner were overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>