<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (4) TMI 112 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61098</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee, as the addition made by the ITO to the book result was deemed unjustified. The rejection of the books of accounts lacked proper justification, with no substantial defects identified to warrant such action. The tribunal emphasized the absence of evidentiary support for the reasons provided by the authorities, ultimately concluding that there was no basis for sustaining the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:05:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (4) TMI 112 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61098</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee, as the addition made by the ITO to the book result was deemed unjustified. The rejection of the books of accounts lacked proper justification, with no substantial defects identified to warrant such action. The tribunal emphasized the absence of evidentiary support for the reasons provided by the authorities, ultimately concluding that there was no basis for sustaining the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>