<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (7) TMI 121 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61088</link>
    <description>The court held that the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner (IAC) was the competent authority to levy penalties exceeding Rs. 1,000 for returns filed before 1st April 1971, not the assessing officer. This decision was based on the interpretation of Section 274(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, emphasizing the law at the time of return filing. The judgment referenced various High Court decisions supporting this view and canceled the penalty imposed, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:41:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (7) TMI 121 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61088</link>
      <description>The court held that the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner (IAC) was the competent authority to levy penalties exceeding Rs. 1,000 for returns filed before 1st April 1971, not the assessing officer. This decision was based on the interpretation of Section 274(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, emphasizing the law at the time of return filing. The judgment referenced various High Court decisions supporting this view and canceled the penalty imposed, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>