<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (6) TMI 67 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61087</link>
    <description>The appeal regarding the deduction of borrowings and debts from assets for calculating capital employed under Section 80J was allowed, following a Special Bench decision that Rule 19A(3) is inconsistent with Section 80J. The disallowance of foreign travel expenses was partially allowed, with Rs. 15,000 accepted as a legitimate business expense. The disallowance of the depreciation claim on cars was overturned, and the ITO was directed to allow the claim, subject to actual computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:39:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (6) TMI 67 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61087</link>
      <description>The appeal regarding the deduction of borrowings and debts from assets for calculating capital employed under Section 80J was allowed, following a Special Bench decision that Rule 19A(3) is inconsistent with Section 80J. The disallowance of foreign travel expenses was partially allowed, with Rs. 15,000 accepted as a legitimate business expense. The disallowance of the depreciation claim on cars was overturned, and the ITO was directed to allow the claim, subject to actual computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>