<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (12) TMI 42 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61079</link>
    <description>Penalty for concealment under section 271(1)(c) was stated to require actual concealment of income, and a protective assessment alone was not enough to establish that element. The interest amount had been brought to tax only on a protective basis, and the record did not show that the assessee had advanced the alleged loan or actually received the interest. On that basis, the concealment allegation could not be sustained and the penalty was cancelled in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:24:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (12) TMI 42 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61079</link>
      <description>Penalty for concealment under section 271(1)(c) was stated to require actual concealment of income, and a protective assessment alone was not enough to establish that element. The interest amount had been brought to tax only on a protective basis, and the record did not show that the assessee had advanced the alleged loan or actually received the interest. On that basis, the concealment allegation could not be sustained and the penalty was cancelled in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>