<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (1) TMI 49 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61070</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the claimed loss on the purchase and sale of cotton through a third party was genuine, not bogus, as evidenced by proper documentation. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled that the loss did not represent a speculative transaction since it was a solitary transaction and did not constitute a speculative business under the relevant legal provisions. Therefore, the Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, directing the adjustment of the loss against the other business income for the year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (1) TMI 49 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61070</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the claimed loss on the purchase and sale of cotton through a third party was genuine, not bogus, as evidenced by proper documentation. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled that the loss did not represent a speculative transaction since it was a solitary transaction and did not constitute a speculative business under the relevant legal provisions. Therefore, the Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, directing the adjustment of the loss against the other business income for the year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>