<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (9) TMI 119 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61055</link>
    <description>The Tribunal revoked the stay order granted to the assessee due to repeated violations of payment and security furnishing directions. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of compliance with its orders, criticized attempts to influence payments, and stressed the need for honesty and fairness in dealing with stay petitions. As a result, the Department was permitted to recover the entire outstanding demand at its discretion, and the appeal lost its priority status, returning to the regular hearing schedule. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was communicated to tax authorities for necessary action and record-keeping.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 16:38:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (9) TMI 119 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61055</link>
      <description>The Tribunal revoked the stay order granted to the assessee due to repeated violations of payment and security furnishing directions. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of compliance with its orders, criticized attempts to influence payments, and stressed the need for honesty and fairness in dealing with stay petitions. As a result, the Department was permitted to recover the entire outstanding demand at its discretion, and the appeal lost its priority status, returning to the regular hearing schedule. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was communicated to tax authorities for necessary action and record-keeping.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>