<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 91 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61050</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of undisclosed income and quashing the assessment order. The Tribunal found the AO&#039;s attempt to convert agricultural income into taxable income unjustified, noting the lack of incriminating evidence and undisclosed investments. The Tribunal emphasized the case&#039;s unique circumstances under new search and seizure provisions, highlighting the insufficient evidence to determine actual agricultural income. Despite arguments from both parties, the Tribunal concluded that the undisclosed income addition was unwarranted, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 16:21:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 91 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61050</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of undisclosed income and quashing the assessment order. The Tribunal found the AO&#039;s attempt to convert agricultural income into taxable income unjustified, noting the lack of incriminating evidence and undisclosed investments. The Tribunal emphasized the case&#039;s unique circumstances under new search and seizure provisions, highlighting the insufficient evidence to determine actual agricultural income. Despite arguments from both parties, the Tribunal concluded that the undisclosed income addition was unwarranted, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>