<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 151 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61046</link>
    <description>Interest on enhanced compensation for acquired land was treated as accruing year by year, but that accrual did not enable the assessee to anticipate the quantified amount for advance-tax purposes. On the facts, there was no default in advance-tax estimation that attracted interest liability. Accordingly, interest was held not chargeable under the advance-tax interest provisions, and the assessee succeeded on the substantive issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 16:02:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 151 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61046</link>
      <description>Interest on enhanced compensation for acquired land was treated as accruing year by year, but that accrual did not enable the assessee to anticipate the quantified amount for advance-tax purposes. On the facts, there was no default in advance-tax estimation that attracted interest liability. Accordingly, interest was held not chargeable under the advance-tax interest provisions, and the assessee succeeded on the substantive issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>