<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 176 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61038</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed both the revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. It directed the Assessing Officer to compute income with a net profit rate of 9% and to allow depreciation if claimed. The issue of interest on borrowed capital was referred back to the Bench for reconsideration to align premises and determine if interest should be included in the net profit estimation or allowed separately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:51:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 176 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61038</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed both the revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. It directed the Assessing Officer to compute income with a net profit rate of 9% and to allow depreciation if claimed. The issue of interest on borrowed capital was referred back to the Bench for reconsideration to align premises and determine if interest should be included in the net profit estimation or allowed separately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>