<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 108 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61037</link>
    <description>Damages or fine paid under section 14B of the Employees&#039; Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 were treated as deductible business expenditure under section 37(1) where the impost was found to be compensatory rather than penal. The test applied was whether the statutory levy arose from delay in remitting provident fund dues and administrative charges, without wilful retention of employees&#039; contributions or habitual default. On that footing, the payment was held wholly allowable, and the earlier adverse disposal was treated as a mistake. The miscellaneous application was accordingly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:45:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 108 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61037</link>
      <description>Damages or fine paid under section 14B of the Employees&#039; Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 were treated as deductible business expenditure under section 37(1) where the impost was found to be compensatory rather than penal. The test applied was whether the statutory levy arose from delay in remitting provident fund dues and administrative charges, without wilful retention of employees&#039; contributions or habitual default. On that footing, the payment was held wholly allowable, and the earlier adverse disposal was treated as a mistake. The miscellaneous application was accordingly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>