<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 143 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61019</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed by the ITO and confirmed by the AAC under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, finding that the assessee had concealed income by furnishing inaccurate particulars. The decision was based on the assessee&#039;s failure to provide additional evidence during penalty proceedings, with the Tribunal deeming the penalty justified due to substantial evidence gathered during assessment. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:49:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 143 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61019</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed by the ITO and confirmed by the AAC under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, finding that the assessee had concealed income by furnishing inaccurate particulars. The decision was based on the assessee&#039;s failure to provide additional evidence during penalty proceedings, with the Tribunal deeming the penalty justified due to substantial evidence gathered during assessment. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>