<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (10) TMI 122 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61002</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ultimately considered the return for assessment year 1987-88 as valid due to the nature of the loss (unabsorbed depreciation), despite being filed late. However, for assessment year 1988-89, the return was correctly treated as non est due to late filing. Both appeals were dismissed, with the Tribunal providing a detailed interpretation of Section 139(10) and its application to loss returns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:19:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (10) TMI 122 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61002</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ultimately considered the return for assessment year 1987-88 as valid due to the nature of the loss (unabsorbed depreciation), despite being filed late. However, for assessment year 1988-89, the return was correctly treated as non est due to late filing. Both appeals were dismissed, with the Tribunal providing a detailed interpretation of Section 139(10) and its application to loss returns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=61002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>