<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (4) TMI 117 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60992</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of the embezzlement loss, ruling it as misappropriation of trade receivables rather than embezzlement. However, the disallowance of interest on debit balances of partners was partially allowed, with the case remanded for reconsideration based on net debit balances of all partners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 12:47:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (4) TMI 117 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60992</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of the embezzlement loss, ruling it as misappropriation of trade receivables rather than embezzlement. However, the disallowance of interest on debit balances of partners was partially allowed, with the case remanded for reconsideration based on net debit balances of all partners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>