<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (5) TMI 77 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60989</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the individual, who received remuneration from a HUF, determining that there was an employer-employee relationship between the HUF and the individual. The tribunal allowed the standard deduction claimed by the individual, emphasizing the validity of the agreement and the nature of the payment, contrary to the earlier decision to tax the remuneration under &#039;Income from other sources&#039; instead of &#039;Salaries&#039;.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 12:42:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (5) TMI 77 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60989</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the individual, who received remuneration from a HUF, determining that there was an employer-employee relationship between the HUF and the individual. The tribunal allowed the standard deduction claimed by the individual, emphasizing the validity of the agreement and the nature of the payment, contrary to the earlier decision to tax the remuneration under &#039;Income from other sources&#039; instead of &#039;Salaries&#039;.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>