<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (4) TMI 115 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60986</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the AAC&#039;s decision, emphasizing the lack of evidence supporting the existence of goodwill in the firm and the absence of a gift in the retirement of the partners. The judgment highlights the importance of proving the presence of goodwill and consideration in assessing gift tax on retirement transactions, ultimately dismissing the appeals and cross-objections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 12:37:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (4) TMI 115 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60986</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the AAC&#039;s decision, emphasizing the lack of evidence supporting the existence of goodwill in the firm and the absence of a gift in the retirement of the partners. The judgment highlights the importance of proving the presence of goodwill and consideration in assessing gift tax on retirement transactions, ultimately dismissing the appeals and cross-objections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>