<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (3) TMI 120 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60982</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the AAC&#039;s decision, ruling that a single speculative transaction does not necessarily constitute a speculative business under Explanation 2 to section 28 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The judgment highlighted the significance of specific provisions prevailing over general provisions in tax law interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 12:29:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (3) TMI 120 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60982</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the AAC&#039;s decision, ruling that a single speculative transaction does not necessarily constitute a speculative business under Explanation 2 to section 28 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The judgment highlighted the significance of specific provisions prevailing over general provisions in tax law interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>