<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (12) TMI 92 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60965</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal overturned the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act on the assessee for alleged concealment of income. The Tribunal found that the fine amount in dispute was contributed by partners out of their own resources and not by the partnership firm. It held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s rejection of the claim lacked basis or material, concluding that the assessee acted bona fide. Consequently, the penalty was canceled as the revenue failed to establish a case for levying it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:49:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (12) TMI 92 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60965</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal overturned the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act on the assessee for alleged concealment of income. The Tribunal found that the fine amount in dispute was contributed by partners out of their own resources and not by the partnership firm. It held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s rejection of the claim lacked basis or material, concluding that the assessee acted bona fide. Consequently, the penalty was canceled as the revenue failed to establish a case for levying it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>