<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (7) TMI 125 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60960</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to direct two separate assessments for distinct periods, rejecting the revenue&#039;s appeal. It clarified that the firm automatically dissolved upon the partner&#039;s death as per the amended law and absence of a continuation clause in the partnership deed, necessitating separate assessments for each period. The judgment emphasized the proviso to section 187(2) of the Income-tax Act, mandating dissolution in such circumstances, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:40:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (7) TMI 125 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60960</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to direct two separate assessments for distinct periods, rejecting the revenue&#039;s appeal. It clarified that the firm automatically dissolved upon the partner&#039;s death as per the amended law and absence of a continuation clause in the partnership deed, necessitating separate assessments for each period. The judgment emphasized the proviso to section 187(2) of the Income-tax Act, mandating dissolution in such circumstances, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>