<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (8) TMI 113 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60950</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the reference applications for various issues, including deletion of disallowances and allowances for different expenses and depreciation. The Tribunal found that the decisions were based on factual findings and did not give rise to any referable questions of law. One member disagreed on certain questions but was overruled by the majority opinion and a third member, concluding that the issues were not referable mixed questions of law and facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (8) TMI 113 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60950</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the reference applications for various issues, including deletion of disallowances and allowances for different expenses and depreciation. The Tribunal found that the decisions were based on factual findings and did not give rise to any referable questions of law. One member disagreed on certain questions but was overruled by the majority opinion and a third member, concluding that the issues were not referable mixed questions of law and facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>