<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 154 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60925</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, canceling the CIT&#039;s order under section 263 and deleting the Rs. 48 lakhs addition as unexplained income. The alternative plea for set-off was rejected, and the Rs. 94,601 addition as deemed dividend was dismissed as not pressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 16:28:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=99372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 154 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60925</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, canceling the CIT&#039;s order under section 263 and deleting the Rs. 48 lakhs addition as unexplained income. The alternative plea for set-off was rejected, and the Rs. 94,601 addition as deemed dividend was dismissed as not pressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=60925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>